Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40014152›Full record

ArticleLasers in medical science2025

Cumulative effect of photobiomodulation by blue and red light on tumor cells: in vitro study with mammary adenocarcinoma cells - MCF-7.

Fabiana Dos Santos Ferreirar, Thaís Nogueira de Oliveira Martins, Lauren Pappis, Shaline Wazlawick de Moura, Alencar Kolinski Machado, Hedioneia Maria Foletto Pivetta

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Lasers in medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fabiana Dos Santos FerreirarPhysiotherapy and Rehabilitation Department, Post-Graduate Programme in Functional Rehabilitation, Federal University of Santa Maria, 55 Rubem Martin Berta Street, Santa Maria, RS, 97105-350, Brazil. fabisantosferreira@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5317-1506
Thaís Nogueira de Oliveira MartinsPhysiotherapy and Rehabilitation Department, Post-Graduate Programme in Functional Rehabilitation, Federal University of Santa Maria, 55 Rubem Martin Berta Street, Santa Maria, RS, 97105-350, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7199-6157
Lauren PappisPharmaceutical Science Graduate Program,, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0045-0768
Shaline Wazlawick de MouraPhysiotherapy Graduate Program, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5928-3568
Alencar Kolinski MachadoLaboratory of Cellular Culture and Genetics, Franciscan University, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2003-8420
Hedioneia Maria Foletto PivettaPhysiotherapy and Rehabilitation Department, Post-Graduate Programme in Functional Rehabilitation, Federal University of Santa Maria, 55 Rubem Martin Berta Street, Santa Maria, RS, 97105-350, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3118-6517

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the mechanism of action of photobiomodulation (PBM) on tumor cells is already well described in the literature, its cumulative effect is not. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cumulative effect of photobiomodulation (PBM) with blue (470 nm) and red (658 nm) light at doses of 6 J/cm² and 19 J/cm², respectively, in mammary adenocarcinoma (MCF-7) tumor cells. The study analyzed how single and sequential exposures to these lights modulated cell viability, proliferation, dsDNA release, nitric oxide (NO) production, and reactive oxygen species (ROS). Experimental analyses were carried out to verify cell viability and proliferation, release of dsDNA into the extracellular environment, production of nitric oxide (NO), and formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Exposures caused a reduction in cell viability and/or proliferation and there was no increase in mitosis at any of the wavelengths tested. Blue light promoted a reduction in the production of NO and ROS in all analyses. Red light, in a single irradiation at 6 J/cm², was able to promote an increase in NO rates and two cumulative doses at 19 J/cm² increased the formation of ROS. In this study, PBM with blue and red LED, at doses of 6 J/cm² and 19 J/cm² did not cause an increase in cell proliferation but rather reduced the viability and division capacity of breast adenocarcinoma cells.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaBreast NeoplasmsLow-Level Light TherapyCell ProliferationCell SurvivalFemaleHumansMCF-7 CellsNitric OxideReactive Oxygen SpeciesRed LightNitric OxideReactive Oxygen SpeciesCell Proliferation / radiation effectsDose-response relationshipLasers- Semiconductor / therapeutic useOxidative stressPhototherapyRadiation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.