ReviewSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025
15 years supporting adherence to oral anti-cancer treatment: use of the MASCC Oral Agent Teaching Tool (MOATT) worldwide, a review for the future.
Review in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe MASCC Oral Agent Teaching Tool (MOATT®) was developed to address the challenges of patient education and adherence in the context of oral anticancer agents. Despite its evidence-based design and global availability, there is limited documentation on its application in clinical practice and research. This review aims to assess the extent of MOATT usage and evaluate the impact on patient outcomes.
methodsA scoping review was conducted following Joanna Briggs Institute and PRISMA-ScR reporting standards. Databases included CINAHL, Embase, PsycInfo, Web of Science, and PubMed. Inclusion criteria were studies published between 2010 and 2023 that used MOATT in clinical practice or research. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data, with discrepancies resolved by consensus.
findingsSeventeen studies met the inclusion criteria, from nine countries. The MOATT was most used by nurses and pharmacists to guide patient education when initiating new oral anticancer therapies. Reported outcomes included improved patient knowledge, understanding of medication regimens, and comfort in managing treatments. However, only six studies assessed medication adherence, with mixed results. The tool was adapted in various settings, yet there was a notable lack of detailed reports on its usage and outcomes, highlighting underutilization and potential barriers to broader implementation.
conclusionThe MOATT is a valuable tool for supporting patients on oral anticancer agents yet is underutilized in practice. Future research should focus on understanding the barriers to its adoption, exploring patient and provider perspectives, and integrating implementation science to enhance its use in diverse clinical contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.