ArticleOecologia2025
Vegetation influences wolf fine-scale habitat selection and movement rate in a logged coastal rainforest.
Article in Oecologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Vegetation and its modification by humans can shape wildlife habitat selection and movement. A better understanding of how wolves select and move through natural and human modified vegetative cover can be used to implement forest management that considers impacts on wolves and their prey. We analyzed fine-scale wolf habitat selection and movement in a coastal temperate rainforest (Prince of Wales Island, Alaska, USA) in relation to: (1) young (≤ 30 years) and old (> 30 years) logged areas, (2) continuous measures of vegetative cover (as estimated via LiDAR), and (3) distance to roads, using integrated step-selection analysis (iSSA). Wolves selected areas with less forest canopy and understory cover at the population level, although they switched to selecting understory when within logged forest stands. The continuous canopy and understory measures vary at a fine spatial scale and thus appear to better explain fine-scale wolf selection and movement than categorical landcover classes representing the age of logged stands. Wolf selection of young (≤ 30 years) and old (> 30 years) successional logged areas, and areas near roads, was mixed across individuals. All individual wolves avoided canopy cover, but varied in their selection of logged stands, understory, and roads. Similarly, there was variability in movement rate response across individual wolves, although at the population level wolves moved faster through old (> 30 years) logged areas and through areas with less understory vegetation. Open vegetation including that present recently after logging is selected by wolves, and facilitates wolf movement, but this effect may be ephemeral as vegetation undergoes succession.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.