Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40014088›Full record

ArticleBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2025

[Pneumococcal vaccination in people aged 60 and over: relationships between vaccination intention, knowledge, and psychological reasons for the vaccination decision].

Hannah Nordmann, Sarah Anna Katharina Uthoff, Anna Zinkevich, Julia Iwen, Marc Biedermann, Lena Ansmann

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hannah NordmannDepartment für Versorgungsforschung, Abteilung Präventions- und Rehabilitationsforschung, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Ammerländer Heerstraße 114-118, 26129, Oldenburg, Deutschland.
Sarah Anna Katharina UthoffDepartment für Versorgungsforschung, Abteilung Präventions- und Rehabilitationsforschung, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Ammerländer Heerstraße 114-118, 26129, Oldenburg, Deutschland.
Anna ZinkevichDepartment für Versorgungsforschung, Abteilung Präventions- und Rehabilitationsforschung, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Ammerländer Heerstraße 114-118, 26129, Oldenburg, Deutschland. anna.zinkevich@uni-oldenburg.de.
Julia IwenAbteilung Ambulante Versorgung, Verband der Ersatzkassen e. V., Berlin, Deutschland.
Marc BiedermannDezernat Sicherstellung und Versorgungsstruktur, Abteilung Versorgungsstruktur, Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung, Berlin, Deutschland.
Lena AnsmannDepartment für Versorgungsforschung, Abteilung Präventions- und Rehabilitationsforschung, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Ammerländer Heerstraße 114-118, 26129, Oldenburg, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWorldwide, pneumococci are the most common cause of morbidity and mortality from lower respiratory tract infections. Despite recommendations of the Standing Committee on Vaccination (STIKO), the vaccination rate against pneumococci in over 60-year-olds in Germany remains low. This study therefore investigates the associations between psychological reasons for (non-) vaccination, knowledge about pneumococci, age and gender, previous vaccination decisions, and pneumococcal vaccination intention in over 60-year-olds.

methodsThe analysis is based on data from the study "ALtersspezifische Impfinanspruchnahme VErbessern," in which 1117 patients aged 60 and over were surveyed in 2022. In addition to the descriptive evaluation of the cross-sectional data, a Spearman correlation analysis was carried out. Predictive variables were also identified in a linear regression analysis.

resultsConfidence in the safety of vaccination (β = 0.514, p < 0.001) and receiving the influenza vaccination (β = 0.153, p < 0.001) in the last season are the strongest predictors of pneumococcal vaccination intention. In addition, the perceived risk of pneumococcal infection (β = 0.086, p = 0.002) showed a significant positive correlation with vaccination intention. The regression analysis performed was able to explain 48.8% of the variance in vaccination intention (R DISCUSSION: Confidence and risk perception appear to be decisive factors in the decision to get vaccinated. Measures that address these aspects could increase vaccination intention. A joint administration of the influenza and pneumococcal vaccination could be useful, as receiving an influenza vaccination in the previous season showed a positive effect on the intention to get the pneumococcal vaccination.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeMass VaccinationPatient Acceptance of Health CarePneumococcal InfectionsPneumococcal VaccinesVaccinationVaccination HesitancyAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansIntentionMaleMiddle AgedPneumococcal Vaccines5C scaleGeneral practitioner practicesRisk perceptionTheory of planned behaviorVaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID40014088
PMCPMC11950118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.