ReviewClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2026
Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure for stroke prevention: current challenges and future perspectives.
Review in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A recombinant humanized type III collagen coating with anti-inflammatory and endothelialization-promoting effects for left atrial appendage closure devices.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stroke accounts for significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. Accordingly, appropriate prevention is crucial to reduce the global burden of stroke. Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is a viable approach for preventing cardioembolic stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation who have a contraindication to long-term oral anticoagulation due to a non-reversible cause. In the last 2 decades, percutaneous LAAC has become a rapidly evolving field, with multiple devices approved or under clinical development. However, several issues remain, including limited high-quality evidence, late adverse events, and unclear post-procedural antithrombotic therapy. This review offers an up-to-date perspective on percutaneous LAAC, concentrating on current challenges and unmet needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40014086What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.