ArticleAnnals of hematology2025
Azacitidine in combination with HAG for newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory AML: a prospective cohort study.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While Azacitidine combined with HAG (HHT, low-dose cytarabine, G-CSF) regimen has shown promise in treating older and unfit patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), its efficacy in younger patients remains understudied. This study evaluates the effectiveness and safety of Azacitidine combined with the HAG regimen in a broader patient cohort, including newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory AML patients. This single-center, prospective cohort included patients with acute myeloid leukemia admitted to our center from June 2019 to Oct 2022 for induction chemotherapy with the HAGA regimen (Azacitidine combined with HAG). We focused on patients' remission rate, MRD (minimal residual disease) conversion and safety. 71 patients with newly diagnosed or R/R AML were enrolled in this study, with a median follow-up time of 20.5 months. After two cycles of HAGA, patients received 3 cycles intermediate-dose Cytarabine and 1 cycle HAGA regimen as consolidation therapies. The CRc (composite complete remission) rate of HAGA regimen as induction chemotherapy for the overall cohort was 85.9% (61/71), which included 71.8% (51/71) CR and 14.1% (10/71) CRi. The CRc with MRD-negative rate was 76.1%. Median OS (overall survival) and DFS (disease free survival) were not yet reached, and the estimated 24-month OS rate was 65.4% (95%CI: 48.4-78.0%), the estimated 24-month DFS rate 66.0% (95%CI: 48.1-79.0%). Only one patient died in induction. The HAGA regimen can be a new option in addition to intense chemotherapy for newly diagnosed or R/R AML, and with high safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.