ReviewBiochemistry2025
Targeting Bacterial RNA Polymerase: Harnessing Simulations and Machine Learning to Design Inhibitors for Drug-Resistant Pathogens.
Review in Biochemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- A Practical Guide to Transition State Analysis in Biomolecular Simulations with TS-DAR.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2025Article
- Predicting the Impact of Drug Resistance Mutations on Inhibitor Potency with Molecular Dynamics and Machine Learning.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2025Article
- Multiple Strategies for the Application of Medicinal Plant-Derived Bioactive Compounds in Controlling Microbial Biofilm and Virulence Properties.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The increase in antimicrobial resistance presents a major challenge in treating bacterial infections, underscoring the need for innovative drug discovery approaches and novel inhibitors. Bacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP) has emerged as a crucial target for antibiotic development due to its essential role in transcription. RNAP is a molecular motor, and its function relies heavily on the dynamic shifts between multiple conformational states. While biochemical and structural experimental methods offer crucial insights into static RNAP-drug interactions, they fall short in capturing the dynamics at a molecular level. By integrating experimental data with advanced computational techniques like Markov State Models (MSMs), Generalized Master Equation (GME) Models and other machine-learning models constructed from molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, researchers can elucidate novel cryptic pockets that open transiently for antibiotic compounds and gain a more nuanced and comprehensive understanding of RNAP-drug interactions. This integrated approach not only deepens our fundamental knowledge but also enables more targeted and efficient antibiotic design strategies. In this Perspective, we highlight how this synergy between experimental and computational methods has the potential to open new pathways for innovative drug design and combination therapies that may help turn the tide in the ongoing battle against antibiotic-resistant bacteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.