ReviewAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2025
Bioactive Inorganic Materials for Innervated Multi-Tissue Regeneration.
Review in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Electrical Signals at the Subcellular Scale: How Electroactive Materials Regulate Stem Cell Fate.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Review
- Biomaterial-assisted neuralization strategies for tissue engineering applications.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Polysaccharide based biomaterials for advanced wound healing applications.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- The nerve center of organ engineering.Nature communications · 2025Review
- Bioactive Calcium Silico-Phosphate Glasses Doped with MgAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Bioactive Inorganic Materials for Innervated Multi-Tissue Regeneration.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Medical embryology and regenerative medicine: research and applications in clinical practice.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
- Plant Exosome-Loaded Intelligent Hydrogels for Osteoporotic Bone Regeneration: Mechanisms and Applications.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tissue engineering aims to repair damaged tissues with physiological functions recovery. Although several therapeutic strategies are there for tissue regeneration, the functional recovery of regenerated tissues still poses significant challenges due to the lack of concerns of tissue innervation. Design rationale of multifunctional biomaterials with both tissue-induction and neural induction activities shows great potential for functional tissue regeneration. Recently, the research and application of inorganic biomaterials attracts increasing attention in innervated multi-tissue regeneration, such as central nerves, bone, and skin, because of its superior tunable chemical composition, topographical structures, and physiochemical properties. More importantly, inorganic biomaterials are easily combined with other organic materials, biological factors, and external stimuli to enhance their therapeutic effects. This review presents a comprehensive overview of recent advancements of inorganic biomaterials for innervated multi-tissue regeneration. It begins with introducing classification and properties of typical inorganic biomaterials and design rationale of inorganic-based material composites. Then, recent progresses of inorganic biomaterials in regenerating various nerves and nerve-innervated tissues with functional recovery are systematically reviewed. Finally, the existing challenges and future perspectives are proposed. This review may pave the way for the direction of inorganic biomaterials and offers a new strategy for tissue regeneration in combination of innervation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.