Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40013886›Full record

Trial reportEpilepsia open2025

Efficacy and tolerability of low versus standard daily doses of antiseizure medications in newly diagnosed focal epilepsy. A multicenter, randomized, single-blind, non-inferiority trial (STANDLOW).

Giorgia Giussani, Elisa Bianchi, Edoardo Carlando, Jacopo Cosimo DiFrancesco, Payam Tabaee Damavandi, Francesco Pasini, Giulia Pederzoli, Stefania Filipponi, Alessandra Gaiani, Luca Massacesi and 28 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Epilepsia open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

38 authors.

Giorgia GiussaniLaboratory of Neurological Disorders, Department of Neuroscience, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2460-3095
Elisa BianchiLaboratory of Neurological Disorders, Department of Neuroscience, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0279-0128
Edoardo CarlandoLaboratory of Neurological Disorders, Department of Neuroscience, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Jacopo Cosimo DiFrancescoDepartment of Neurology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo Dei Tintori, Monza, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4102-1188
Payam Tabaee DamavandiDepartment of Neurology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo Dei Tintori, Monza, Italy.
Francesco PasiniDepartment of Neurology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo Dei Tintori, Monza, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9966-9892
Giulia PederzoliDepartment of Neurology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo Dei Tintori, Monza, Italy.
Stefania FilipponiDepartment of Neurology, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy.
Alessandra GaianiDepartment of Neurology, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy.
Luca MassacesiDipartimento di Neuroscienze, Università di Firenze and SOD Neurologia, Florence, Italy.
Eleonora RosatiSOD Neurologia, Florence, Italy.
Ginevra GiovannelliSOD Neurologia, Florence, Italy.
Teresa Anna CantisaniAzienda Ospedaliera di Perugia, SSD Neurofisiopatologia, Dipartimento di Neuroscienze, Perugia, Italy.
Michela CecconiAzienda Ospedaliera di Perugia, SSD Neurofisiopatologia, Dipartimento di Neuroscienze, Perugia, Italy.
Rossella PapettiAzienda Ospedaliera di Perugia, SSD Neurofisiopatologia, Dipartimento di Neuroscienze, Perugia, Italy.
Monica BrioschiDepartment of Neurology, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano ASST Niguarda Hospital Milan, Milan, Italy.
Francesco ArutaDepartment of Neurology, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano ASST Niguarda Hospital Milan, Milan, Italy.
Elio Clemente AgostoniDepartment of Neurology, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano ASST Niguarda Hospital Milan, Milan, Italy.
Francesco PaladinNeurology Unit, Epilepsy Center, Venice, Italy.
Filippo DaineseUnit of Neurology and Unit of Clinical Neurophysiology, Department of Neuroscience, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Marco LongoniUO Neurologia e Stroke Unit, Ospedale M Bufalini Cesena, Cesena, Italy.
Bartolini YermaUO Neurologia e Stroke Unit, Ospedale M Bufalini Cesena, Cesena, Italy.
Sara GaspariniDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan Hospital of Reggio Calabria, Catanzaro, Italy.
Umberto AgugliaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan Hospital of Reggio Calabria, Catanzaro, Italy.
Edoardo FerlazzoDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Regional Epilepsy Centre, Great Metropolitan Hospital of Reggio Calabria, Catanzaro, Italy.
Roberto CantelloNeurology Unit, Department of Translational Medicine, Epilepsy Center, University of Piemonte Orientale, and Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria "Maggiore Della Carità", Novara, Italy.
Gionata StrigaroNeurology Unit, Department of Translational Medicine, Epilepsy Center, University of Piemonte Orientale, and Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria "Maggiore Della Carità", Novara, Italy.
Marta MaschioCenter for Tumor-Related Epilepsy, UOSD Neuro-Oncology, IRCCS IFO Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Dario BenincasaCenter for Tumor-Related Epilepsy, UOSD Neuro-Oncology, IRCCS IFO Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Angela La NeveDBraiN, University Hospital of Bari "A. Moro", Bari, Italy.
Giovanni FalcicchioDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, Neurosciences and Sense Organs, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0745-5246
Alfonso GiordanoDepartment of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Lara ButtarelliDepartment of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Gabriele EniaLaboratory of Neurological Disorders, Department of Neuroscience, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3590-3045
Maurizio LeoneLaboratory of Neurological Disorders, Department of Neuroscience, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Carlo FerrareseDepartment of Neurology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo Dei Tintori, Monza, Italy.
Ettore BeghiLaboratory of Neurological Disorders, Department of Neuroscience, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2542-0469
Simone BerettaDepartment of Neurology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo Dei Tintori, Monza, Italy.

Funding

Italian ministry of Health RF-2016-02363902
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe STANDLOW trial investigated whether first-line antiseizure monotherapy with low doses has a similar efficacy to standard doses, but with fewer adverse events, improved quality of life, and reduced costs for the National Health System.

methodsMulticenter, randomized, parallel-arm, single-blind, non-inferiority trial, comparing low dose versus standard dose of antiseizure medications (carbamazepine, levetiracetam, valproate, zonisamide, oxcarbazepine, topiramate, lamotrigine, gabapentin, lacosamide) in adults with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy.

resultsThe intention-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of 58 randomized patients, 29 in the low dose arm and 29 in the standard dose arm, 27 (46.6%) females and 31 (53.4%) males, with an age between 18 and 87 years (median 54.9, IQR 32-71). The seizure type was focal impaired awareness seizures in 44 (75.9%) and focal aware seizures in 14 (24.1%). Etiology was unknown in 43 (74.1%) and structural in 15 (25.9%). At study entry, EEG was epileptiform in 28 (48.2%) and seizure frequency was low (≤2 seizures/month) in 41 (70.7%). The estimated relapse proportions at 12 months were 47% for the low dose and 48% for the standard dose, with a difference of 1% (95% CI: -30%; 27%). At the end of the study visit (12 months of follow-up, or immediately after seizure relapse or study withdrawal for other reasons, whichever came first), no differences in the number or severity of adverse events or quality of life measures were observed between the two treatment groups. The total drug-related costs over the entire study period were lower in the low dose arm (median per participant 253 € versus 475 € in the standard dose arm). SIGNIFICANCE: Although the efficacy of low doses versus standard doses appeared similar, non-inferiority could not be demonstrated due to slow recruitment and premature termination of the trial. Although statistically inconclusive, our findings suggest that a low dose of antiseizure medications may be considered as a first-line option in adult patients with a new diagnosis of focal epilepsy of unknown etiology and low seizure frequency. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: This study aimed to see if low doses of anti-seizure medications (ASMs) could be as effective as standard doses in treating adults with newly diagnosed epilepsy. Subjects were assigned to receive either a low or standard dose of ASMs. 58 adults participated. Both low and standard doses seemed to have a similar effect on controlling seizures. The study was stopped early due to slow enrollment, making it difficult to definitively prove that low doses were non-inferior to standard doses. Low doses of ASMs might be a reasonable option for adults with newly diagnosed epilepsy with no clear cause and few seizures.

Indexed as

AnticonvulsantsEpilepsies, PartialAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeSingle-Blind MethodTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAnticonvulsantsefficacyfocal epilepsylow dosemonotherapynewly‐diagnosed epilepsyrandomized trial

Identifiers

PMID40013886
PMCPMC12014934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.