ReviewEnvironmental science & technology2025
Using Suction Lysimeters for Determining the Potential of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances to Leach from Soil to Groundwater: A Review.
Review in Environmental science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bridging single-species research and mixture reality: Emerging contaminants fate and transport in vadose zones.Journal of environmental qualityReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In-situ porewater samples were proposed to best represent the fraction of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) with the potential to migrate to groundwater. While there are many techniques for collecting porewater samples, suction lysimeters are frequently being used for PFAS investigations. Suction lysimeters use vacuum to extract porewater from vadose zone soils, typically fine to medium sands, which retain and release enough porewater for analysis. Importantly, determining the rate of PFAS migration to groundwater requires an independent measure of water percolation. This review covers the installation and sampling methods for suction lysimeters and provides suggestions to improve the utility and reduce the variability of the results. Because the volume of soil represented by the porewater sample varies significantly depending on the soil-water content, which is spatially and temporally variable, many suction lysimeters may be required to accurately represent soil heterogeneity. A similar limitation applies to soil or leaching protocol samples. Suction lysimeters may not provide a representative sample for all PFAS due to interactions with lysimeter materials, air-water interfaces, and the use of vacuum. Consequently, lysimeter data are best applied in combination with soil-leaching protocols, groundwater transects, and soil analysis when making remedial decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.