ReviewCancer medicine2025
CAR-T Cell Manufacturing for Hematological and Solid Tumors: From the Preclinical to Clinical Point of View.
Review in Cancer medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy and Safety of Lisocabtagene Maraleucel in Relapsed or Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Product-Specific Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials and Real-World Studies.Hematology reports · 2026Review
- The global clinical trial landscape of lung cancer cellular therapy current status trends and scientific challenges.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Beyond αβ T cells: unlocking the potential of diverse immune cells in CAR modification.Clinical science (London, England : 1979) · 2026Review
- CAR T Cell Therapy in Lung Cancer: Overcoming Tumor Microenvironment-Mediated Barriers.International journal of biological sciences · 2026Review
- CAR-T Cell Therapy in Glioblastoma: Overcoming Immunological Barriers and Advancing Clinical Translation.Cancer management and research · 2026Review
- Genomic medicine in hepatology: mechanisms and liver treatment strategies.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Review
- Unleashing the power of CAR-M therapy in solid tumors: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Medulloblastoma: biology and immunotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cell therapy based on chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells has represented a revolutionary new approach for treating tumors, especially hematological diseases. Complete remission rates (CRR) > 80%-97% and 50%-90% overall response rates (ORR) have been achieved with a treatment based on CAR-T cells in patients with malignant B-cell tumors that have relapsed or are refractory to previous treatments. Toxicity remains the major problem. Most patients treated with CAR-T cells develop high-grade cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). However, the unprecedentedly high CRR and ORR have led to the approval of six CAR-T cell therapeutics by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA), prompting researchers to improve existing products and develop new ones. By now, around 1000 clinical trials based on CAR-T cells are registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: 82% are for hematological diseases, while the remaining 16% are for solid tumors. As a result of this increased research, an enormous amount of conflicting information has been accumulated in the literature, and each group follows its manufacturing protocols and performs specific in vitro testing. This review aimed to combine and compare clinical and preclinical information, highlighting the most used protocols to provide a comprehensive overview of the in vitro world of CAR-T cells, from manufacturing to their characterization. The focus is on all steps of the CAR-T cell manufacturing process, from the collection of patient or donor blood to the enrichment of T cells, their activation with anti-CD3/CD28 beads, interleukin-2 (IL-2) or IL-7 and IL-15 (induction of a more functional memory phenotype), and their transfection (viral or non-viral methods). Automation is crucial for ensuring a standardized final product.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.