Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40013677›Full record

ArticleeLife2025

Characterization of direct Purkinje cell outputs to the brainstem.

Christopher H Chen, Zhiyi Yao, Shuting Wu, Wade G Regehr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Brain-wide mapping of developmental trajectories of cerebellar efferent projections.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christopher H Chen *Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4611-8667
Zhiyi Yao *Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States.
Shuting WuDepartment of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2264-7393
Wade G RegehrDepartment of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3485-8094

Funding

Mechanisms and Functions of Synapses and CircuitsR35NS097284 · NINDS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI REGEHR, WADE G · 2017 to 2024
$7.5M
Super-Resolution ImagingP30NS072030 · NINDS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI REGEHR, WADE G · 2011 to 2020
$5.8M
Short-Term Synaptic Plasticity in the CNSR01NS032405 · NINDS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI REGEHR, WADE G · 1995 to 2016
$4.8M
Cerebellar Outputs Through an Unconventional NucleusR00NS110978 · NINDS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI CHEN, CHRISTOPHER · 2023 to 2025
$711k
TissueCyte 1600FC Whole Mount Tissue ScannerS10OD026866 · OD · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI SABATINI, BERNARDO L · 2019 to 2019
$612k
NIH HHS S10 OD026866NIMH NIH HHS R01NS032405NINDS NIH HHS P30 NS072030NINDS NIH HHS R00 NS110978NINDS NIH HHS R00NS110978NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS032405NINDS NIH HHS R35 NS097284NINDS NIH HHS R35NS097284
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purkinje cells (PCs) primarily project to cerebellar nuclei but also directly innervate the brainstem. Some PC-brainstem projections have been described previously, but most have not been thoroughly characterized. Here, we use a PC-specific cre line to anatomically and electrophysiologically characterize PC projections to the brainstem. PC synapses are surprisingly widespread, with the highest densities found in the vestibular and parabrachial nuclei. However, there are pronounced regional differences in synaptic densities within both the vestibular and parabrachial nuclei. Large optogenetically evoked PC-IPSCs are preferentially observed in subregions with the highest densities of putative PC boutons, suggesting that PCs selectively influence these areas and the behaviors they regulate. Unexpectedly, the pontine central gray and nearby subnuclei also contained a low density of putative PC boutons, and large PC-IPSCs are observed in a small fraction of cells. We combined electrophysiological recordings with immunohistochemistry to assess the molecular identities of two potential PC targets: PC synapses onto mesencephalic trigeminal neurons were not observed even though these cells are in close proximity to PC boutons; PC synapses onto locus coeruleus neurons are exceedingly rare or absent, even though previous studies concluded that PCs are a major input to these neurons. The availability of a highly selective cre line for PCs allowed us to study functional synapses, while avoiding complications that can accompany the use of viral approaches. We conclude that PCs directly innervate numerous brainstem nuclei, and in many nuclei they strongly inhibit a small fraction of cells. This suggests that PCs selectively target cell types with specific behavioral roles in the brainstem.

Indexed as

Brain StemNeural PathwaysPurkinje CellsAnimalsImmunohistochemistryMiceSynapsesbrainstemcerebellumlocus coeruleusmouseneurosciencePurkinje cellvestibular nuclei

Identifiers

PMID40013677
PMCPMC11867612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.