The Oxford Visual Perception Screen: Development and normative data of a standardised assessment for visual perception difficulties.

Kathleen Vancleef, Ruby Castellani, Rebecca Shorthose, Catherine Guo, Merak Fulin Cai, Federica Guazzo, Nele Demeyere

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Clinical rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

1citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

HK-OxVPS: an adaptation of the Oxford Visual Perception Screen for the Cantonese speaking population in Hong Kong.Frontiers in neurology · 2025
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kathleen VancleefDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9943-9341

Ruby CastellaniDepartment of Psychology, Durham University, Durham, UK.ORCID 0009-0009-2336-6682

Rebecca ShorthoseDepartment of Psychology, Durham University, Durham, UK.ORCID 0009-0004-9879-4802

Catherine GuoDepartment of Psychology, Durham University, Durham, UK.ORCID 0009-0007-9773-4287

Merak Fulin CaiDepartment of Psychology, Durham University, Durham, UK.ORCID 0009-0003-9779-2613

Federica GuazzoDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5160-3333

Nele DemeyereDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0416-5147

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ObjectiveWe aimed to develop and standardise a practical systematic screening tool for visual perception impairments after a stroke to replace current subjective methods.DesignA mixed methods study including a cross-sectional study and a case series.SettingIn the community and on stroke rehabilitation units.ParticipantsOlder volunteers without a neurological history contributed to normative data. Patients with ocular conditions or a stroke took part in our case series.InstrumentThe Oxford Visual Perception Screen.Main measuresFor each task of the Oxford Visual Perception Screen, we determined 5

Indexed as

StrokeStroke RehabilitationVision DisordersVisual PerceptionAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReference ValuesVisual Acuityassessmentcognitive impairmentnormative dataPerceptionvisual impairment

Identifiers

PMID40013609

DOI10.1177/02692155251315606

PMCPMC12018711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.