Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40013598›Full record

ReviewPest management science2025

Plant protection treatments in Switzerland using unmanned aerial vehicles: regulatory framework and lessons learned.

Thomas Anken, Guillaume Coupy, Pierre-Henri Dubuis, Guillaume Favre, H Christoph Geiser, Alexandre Gurba, Maria Häni, Markus Hochstrasser, Marco Landis, Tristan Maitre and 6 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pest management science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Thomas AnkenAgroscope, Tänikon 1, Ettenhausen, Switzerland.
Guillaume CoupyCanton of Valais, Department of Economy and Education, Sion, Switzerland.
Pierre-Henri DubuisAgroscope, Swiss Federal Agricultural Research Station in Changins, Nyon, Switzerland.
Guillaume FavreCanton of Valais, Department of Economy and Education, Sion, Switzerland.
H Christoph GeiserFederal Food Safety and Veterinary Office (FSVO), Bern, Switzerland.
Alexandre GurbaFederal Office of the Environment (FOEN), Bern, Switzerland.
Maria HäniFederal Office of Civil Aviation (FOCA), Bern, Switzerland.
Markus HochstrasserCanton of Zurich, Office for Landscape and Nature, Strickhof, Lindau, Switzerland.
Marco LandisCanton of Zurich, Office for Landscape and Nature, Strickhof, Lindau, Switzerland.
Tristan MaitreFederal Office of Civil Aviation (FOCA), Bern, Switzerland.
Christoph MoorFederal Office of the Environment (FOEN), Bern, Switzerland.
Patrick MouronFederal Office for Agriculture (FOAG), Bern, Switzerland.
Olivier SanvidoState Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO), Bern, Switzerland.
Yannick WagnerCanton of Aargau, Liebegg Agricultural Center, Gränichen, Switzerland.
Jürg A ZarnFederal Food Safety and Veterinary Office (FSVO), Bern, Switzerland.
Sebastian L B KönigFederal Food Safety and Veterinary Office (FSVO), Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4766-6729

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Switzerland was the first European country to approve the use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for the purpose of plant protection treatments. The regulatory framework that has been established requires UAV sprayers to undergo a series of technical assessments that have generated a substantial amount of data. Here, we first describe the regulatory framework and the underlying rationales, followed by analyzing data from the technical assessments. The results show that the UAV sprayers being used in Switzerland achieve homogeneous transversal spray liquid distributions with coefficients of variation below 15 % at effective swath widths that are typically lower than those indicated by UAV manufacturers. Moreover, the lateral wind generated by the UAV sprayers as measured at distances of 10 m and 20 m, respectively, is not substantially affected by UAV size or weight. A survey we conducted to gain insight into agricultural practices under the current regulatory framework suggests that up to 11.5 % of the total of Swiss vineyards were treated with UAV sprayers in 2023. Other uses, such as spreading slug pellets, seem to gain importance as well. Finally, efficacy trials performed in Swiss vineyards suggest that UAV sprayers achieve limited control efficacy of powdery and downy mildew at high disease pressure, which is likely to be due to the relatively low amount of deposit around and on the bunches. We conclude this paper by outlining future regulatory challenges and directions for further development. © 2025 The Author(s). Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Indexed as

AgricultureCrop ProtectionPlant DiseasesUnmanned Aerial DevicesSwitzerlandDronepesticide applicationsplant protection productsregulatory frameworkunmanned aerial vehicleunmanned aircraft system

Identifiers

PMID40013598
PMCPMC12159360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.