ArticleStatistical methods in medical research2025
Outcome adaptive propensity score methods for handling censoring and high-dimensionality: Application to insurance claims.
Article in Statistical methods in medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Outcome-Adaptive Lasso for Cox Proportional Hazards Model.Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Propensity scores are commonly used to reduce the confounding bias in non-randomized observational studies for estimating the average treatment effect. An important assumption underlying this approach is that all confounders that are associated with both the treatment and the outcome of interest are measured and included in the propensity score model. In the absence of strong prior knowledge about potential confounders, researchers may agnostically want to adjust for a high-dimensional set of pre-treatment variables. As such, variable selection procedure is needed for propensity score estimation. In addition, studies show that including variables related to treatment only in the propensity score model may inflate the variance of the treatment effect estimators, while including variables that are predictive of only the outcome can improve efficiency. In this article, we propose to incorporate outcome-covariate relationship in the propensity score model by including the predicted binary outcome probability as a covariate. Our approach can be easily adapted to an ensemble of variable selection methods, including regularization methods and modern machine-learning tools based on classification and regression trees. We evaluate our method to estimate the treatment effects on a binary outcome, which is possibly censored, across multiple treatment groups. Simulation studies indicate that incorporating outcome probability for estimating the propensity scores can improve statistical efficiency and protect against model misspecification. The proposed methods are applied to a cohort of advanced-stage prostate cancer patients identified from a private insurance claims database for comparing the adverse effects of four commonly used drugs for treating castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.