ArticleTurkish journal of ophthalmology2025
Clinical Characteristics and Analysis of Spontaneous Consecutive Exotropia in Children with Refractive Accommodative Esotropia.
Article in Turkish journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ocular features and accommodative components in patients with spontaneous consecutive exotropia.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the clinical characteristics and risk factors associated with spontaneous consecutive exotropia (ScXT) in children diagnosed with refractive accommodative esotropia (RAET). Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of medical records was conducted on 19 patients who demonstrated a spontaneous transition from RAET to exotropia (XT). Patients who received strabismus surgery or botulinum toxin injection were excluded from the study. The control group consisted of 31 age-matched patients with RAET who demonstrated successful optical alignment at both near and distance. The ophthalmological examination findings of the study and control groups were compared. Independent two-sample t-test and Pearson's chi-square test were used to evaluate the data of the patients. Results: The study examined patients diagnosed with RAET who developed consecutive XT. Among them, 15 (78.9%) were female and 4 (21.1%) were male. The mean age at esotropia (ET) onset was 22.68 months (standard deviation [SD]: 12.91). The control group consisted of 16 (51.6%) female and 15 (48.4%) male patients, with a mean age at ET onset of 25.09 months (SD: 15.47). Mean age at onset did not differ between the groups (p=0.55). The mean interval between ET onset and appearance of XT was 7.53 years (SD: 1.49). Cycloplegic refraction measurements taken during the initial examination indicated that the study group exhibited greater degrees of hypermetropia in their right (p=0.01) and left (p=0.04) eyes than did the control group. Furthermore, the incidence of inferior oblique muscle overaction was higher among the study group (p=0.03). Conclusion: The findings indicate that patients with high hypermetropic refraction values should be monitored for an extended period due to the increased risk of developing subsequent XT. Concomitant inferior oblique overaction can increase the risk of ScXT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.