ArticlePsychophysiology2025
Behaviorally Irrelevant Feature Matching Increases Neural and Behavioral Working Memory Readout.
Article in Psychophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exogenously Driven Neural Reactivation of Spatially Matching Visual Working-Memory Contents.eNeuro · 2026Article
- Sustained alpha oscillations serve attentional prioritization in working memory, not maintenance.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is an ongoing debate about whether working memory (WM) maintenance relies on persistent activity and/or short-term synaptic plasticity. This is a challenging question, because neuroimaging techniques in cognitive neuroscience measure activity only. Recently, neural perturbation techniques have been developed to tackle this issue, such as visual impulse perturbation or "pinging," which reveals (un)attended WM content during maintenance. There are contrasting explanations of how pinging reveals WM content, which is central to the debate. Pinging could reveal mnemonic representations by perturbing content-specific networks or by increasing the neural signal-to-noise ratio of active neural states. Here we tested the extent to which the neural impulse response is patterned by the WM network, by presenting two different impulse stimuli. If the impulse interacts with WM networks, the WM-specific impulse response should be enhanced by physical overlap between the initial memory item and the subsequent external perturbation stimulus. This prediction was tested in a working memory task by matching or mismatching task-irrelevant spatial frequencies between memory items and impulse stimuli, as well as probes. Matching probe spatial frequency with memory items resulted in faster behavioral response times and matching impulse spatial frequency with memory items increased the specificity of the neural impulse response as measured from EEG. Matching spatial frequencies did neither result in globally stronger neural responses nor in a larger decrease in trial-to-trial variability compared to mismatching spatial frequencies. The improved neural and behavioral readout of irrelevant feature matching provide evidence that impulse perturbation interacts directly with the memory representations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.