Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40013370›Full record

ArticleThe Laryngoscope2025

Quality of Life Outcomes in Vestibular Schwannoma: A Prospective Analysis of Treatment Modalities.

A Hotchkies, E Heward, A Wadeson, C Heal, S R Freeman, S A Rutherford, A T King, O Pathmanaban, J Halliday, G Whitfield and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Laryngoscope, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effects of surgery, radiotherapy or surveillance on the objective vestibular function, vestibular symptoms and quality of life in vestibular schwannoma patients.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

A HotchkiesManchester Skull Base Unit, Salford Royal Hospital, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4831-8141
E HewardManchester Skull Base Unit, Salford Royal Hospital, Manchester, UK.
A WadesonManchester Skull Base Unit, Salford Royal Hospital, Manchester, UK.
C HealFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
S R FreemanManchester Skull Base Unit, Salford Royal Hospital, Manchester, UK.
S A RutherfordManchester Skull Base Unit, Salford Royal Hospital, Manchester, UK.
A T KingManchester Skull Base Unit, Salford Royal Hospital, Manchester, UK.
O PathmanabanManchester Skull Base Unit, Salford Royal Hospital, Manchester, UK.
J HallidayManchester Skull Base Unit, Salford Royal Hospital, Manchester, UK.
G WhitfieldThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
C McBainThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
R J ColacoThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
T CampbellFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
S J GohFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
S K W LloydManchester Skull Base Unit, Salford Royal Hospital, Manchester, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveManagement options for vestibular schwannoma include microsurgery (MS), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), and watch, wait, and rescan (WWR). This study aimed to evaluate changes in patient and disease-specific quality of life (QoL) outcomes over time, comparing each treatment modality in a matched cohort.

methodsA prospective cohort study recruited adult patients with sporadic vestibular schwannomas ≤ 3 cm in size undergoing treatment between January 2012 and April 2022 in a single tertiary referral center. Questionnaires were completed at diagnosis and ≥ 12 months posttreatment to assess patient-reported changes in QoL (Hearing, Dizziness, Tinnitus Handicap Inventories; Penn Acoustic Neuroma QoL questionnaire (PANQOL) and the Short Form-36 QoL questionnaire (SF-36)).

resultsIn total, 124 patients returned completed questionnaires (MS: 42, SRS: 42, WWR 40). The SRS group had a clinically significant deterioration in their hearing scores posttreatment (p = 0.002). Dizziness scores worsened in the MS and WWR groups posttreatment; this did not reach clinical significance. Hearing deterioration was identified in the WWR group over time using the PANQOL domain (p = 0.012). The SF-36 questionnaire showed a significant deterioration in physical functioning, role limitations, and component summary for SRS patients posttreatment (p = 0.0018, p = 0.0032, p = 0.0308). No other significant differences were seen in disease-specific or general QoL domains when comparing treatment strategies.

conclusionOutcomes in similar disease-specific domains were not consistent across questionnaires. All three treatment modalities appear to result in comparable long-term disease-specific QoL outcomes. These findings will enable evidence-based patient counseling to inform decision-making. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3:

Indexed as

MicrosurgeryNeuroma, AcousticQuality of LifeRadiosurgeryWatchful WaitingAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment Outcomeconservative managementmicrosurgeryquality of liferadiosurgeryvestibular schwannoma

Identifiers

PMID40013370
PMCPMC12230880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.