Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40013291›Full record

ReviewJournal of advanced veterinary and animal research2024

Transformation toward precision large-scale operations for sustainable farming: A review based on China's pig industry.

Md Kamrul Hasan, Hong-Seok Mun, Keiven Mark B Ampode, Eddiemar B Lagua, Hae-Rang Park, Young-Hwa Kim, Md Sharifuzzaman, Chul-Ju Yang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of advanced veterinary and animal research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Prevalence and Geographical Distribution of FoodborneAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Md Kamrul HasanAnimal Nutrition and Feed Science Laboratory, Department of Animal Science and Technology, Sunchon National University, Suncheon, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5365-6616
Hong-Seok MunAnimal Nutrition and Feed Science Laboratory, Department of Animal Science and Technology, Sunchon National University, Suncheon, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0322-6462
Keiven Mark B AmpodeAnimal Nutrition and Feed Science Laboratory, Department of Animal Science and Technology, Sunchon National University, Suncheon, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2693-6125
Eddiemar B LaguaAnimal Nutrition and Feed Science Laboratory, Department of Animal Science and Technology, Sunchon National University, Suncheon, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0344-1680
Hae-Rang ParkAnimal Nutrition and Feed Science Laboratory, Department of Animal Science and Technology, Sunchon National University, Suncheon, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1804-4139
Young-Hwa KimInterdisciplinary Program in IT-Bio Convergence System (BK21 Plus), Chonnam National University, Gwangju, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9850-8894
Md SharifuzzamanAnimal Nutrition and Feed Science Laboratory, Department of Animal Science and Technology, Sunchon National University, Suncheon, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3195-2891
Chul-Ju YangAnimal Nutrition and Feed Science Laboratory, Department of Animal Science and Technology, Sunchon National University, Suncheon, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3510-3096

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review evaluates the current situation of pig farming, identifies challenges, and projects for the sustainable development of the Chinese pig industry. A literature review using keyword searches was conducted on Google Scholar for articles from 2017-2023. The review included studies focused on pig farming in China, covering prospects, challenges, quantitative data on production, marketing, and consumption, automation in livestock farming, and publications from peer-reviewed journals, credible websites, government reports, and conference proceedings. Pork consumption in China is increasing, and the country imports a sizable amount of pork annually. Even though small-scale farms still account for most operations, the pig industry is undergoing a critical stage of modernization and transition towards large-scale farming. The major challenges identified were feed, disease, antimicrobial resistance, environmental pollution, and pork prices. Smart technologies, such as cameras, Internet of Things, and sensors, integrated into precision pig farming can improve productivity and animal health through real-time data collection and decision-making. To solve the problems we face now, we need to put a lot of money into large-scale transformation, the creation of new animal precision tools, the automation of manure treatment, and the research and development of long-lasting alternative energy sources like photovoltaics and wind. By implementing these strategies, large-scale precision pig farming in China can become economically and environmentally sustainable, which can ultimately benefit consumers by supplying wholesome pork products.

Indexed as

ChinaPig farm operationSmart agricultureSustainability

Identifiers

PMID40013291
PMCPMC11855412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.