ReviewCureus2025
Impact of Sulforaphane on Breast Cancer Progression and Radiation Therapy Outcomes: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sulforaphane in Cancer Prevention and Therapy: A State-of-the-Art Review of Epidemiological Evidence, Molecular Mechanisms, and Translational Challenges.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Botanical Adjuvants in Oncology: A Review on Natural Compounds in Synergy with Conventional Therapies as Next-Generation Enhancers of Breast Cancer Treatment.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- Efficacy and mechanisms of cisplatin and sulforaphane nanoparticles in alleviating cisplatin resistance in non-small cell lung cancer.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Article
- Sulforaphane-Loaded Hydrogel Prolongs Fully MHC-Mismatched Skin Allograft Survival.ACS applied bio materials · 2025Article
- Sulforaphane in cancer precision medicine: from biosynthetic origins to multiscale mechanisms and clinical translation.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer is a debilitating chronic condition that affects millions and causes the death of hundreds of thousands of people annually worldwide. Sulforaphane (SFN) has the potential to prevent and enhance the management of breast cancer and alleviate its poor outcomes. As most of the available evidence on SFN's impact and safety in breast cancer management is from cell culture studies and animal models, there is a need to consolidate this evidence to determine whether there is a need to conduct empirical human studies. This systematic review summarizes and analyzes evidence of SFN's impact on breast cancer progression and radiation therapy outcomes in terms of efficacy and safety. A systematic literature search was performed on PubMed, Cumulated Index in Nursing and Allied Health Literature, ProQuest Central, and ScienceDirect databases to find sources of evidence. The selected sources were published between 2018 and 2024. The inclusion and exclusion criteria included studies published in the last eight years, availability in full-text, published in English, and covering concepts relevant to the topic. The selected sources were summarized through literature review tables and the evidence was synthesized to identify themes relevant to the impact of SFN in breast cancer progression and radiation therapy outcomes. In total, 20 sources of evidence, including three randomized controlled trials, five in vivo animal models, and 12 cell culture studies, were selected for review and analysis. The sources were broadly classified into two themes, namely, the role of SFN in breast cancer biology and the safety of SFN in radiation therapy. The evidence confirmed that SFN targets breast cancer biology by modulating reactive oxygen species and reducing the proliferation of tumors, inducing apoptosis, and inhibiting metastasis. SFN is an effective and safer treatment as it reduces damage to and protects normal cells, causes a synergistic effect rather than interacting with other breast cancer cells, and is effective in concentrations ranging from 5 µM to 200 µM. Cell culture studies and animal models have proven that SFN is highly effective in breast cancer prevention and treatment either as a single intervention or in combination with radiotherapy and chemotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.