ArticleCureus2025
Efficacy of Leap Motion Device on Fine Motor Function and Handwriting in Children With Developmental Coordination Disorder: A Randomized Control Trial.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effect of Coordination Exercises on Hand Function in Patient with Developmental Coordination Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Iranian journal of child neurology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The neurodevelopmental disorder, referred to as developmental coordination disorder (DCD), impacts everyday tasks and academic achievement by impairing muscle coordination. DCD children are very often characterized as "clumsy" and "uncoordinated," which can result in easily rectifiable performance difficulties. The aim and objective of the study were to determine the effectiveness of Leap Motion Controller® (LMC®) exercises on fine motor function and handwriting in children with DCD. Methods After getting ethical clearance from the university institutional ethics committee (DMIMS(DU)/IEC/2022/897), the Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire (DCD'Q07) questionnaire was given to the parents of the children, and duly filled questionnaires were collected from them after one week. Based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-V) criteria, the children prone to DCD were identified from the questionnaire (n = 30). The participants were subsequently divided into the experimental (n = 15) and control groups (n = 15). Children in the experimental group used the LMC® to perform tasks, while those in the control group completed traditional fine motor exercises for the upper limb. Pre- and post-outcome measures were taken using the scale for handwriting evaluation (SHE) and the movement assessment battery for children (MABC) (manual dexterity) by the assessor who was aware of the outcome measures. Results Using software from IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 27 (Released 2020; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States), descriptive and inferential statistics were performed. The Z-test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and Mann-Whitney U test were used for within-group and between-group comparisons. The statistical analysis was conducted with a significance level of p < 0.05. From a statistical and clinical perspective, Group B results were more significant. Improvements in both groups' handwriting and fine motor function were demonstrated by the improvement in the SHE (-0.82, p > 0.412) and MABC (-2.16, p < 0.031) scores. Conclusion This study concluded that leap motion technology significantly improved fine motor function and handwriting in children with developmental coordination disorder. Both groups improve children's academic achievement. The study's findings demonstrated the beneficial effects of LMC® on children's handwriting and fine motor skills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.