ArticleCureus2025
Assessing Levels of Lymphedema Awareness Among Women With Breast Cancer in King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Breast cancer poses a global health challenge, requiring a comprehensive approach beyond diagnosis and treatment. Postoperative complications, especially upper limb lymphedema, present intricate challenges for survivors, impacting physical, emotional, and daily life aspects. Our research in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, delves into cultural and healthcare dynamics, exploring demographic influences on lymphedema. Materials and methods A descriptive quantitative study with a cross-sectional design was conducted among female patients with breast cancer in Saudi Arabia. It included patients who underwent unilateral breast surgery with lymph node excision. Data was analyzed using the SPSS program (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Results Our study included 76 participants. Lymphedema was diagnosed in 38.2% of participants. More than half (52.8%) of participants had some knowledge of lymphedema. For instance, 52.6% recognized the impact of hygiene, and 81.6% understood the heightened risk of arm damage. Awareness percentages were also notable for factors like tight shirt pressure (71.1%), straining the arms (86.8%), and the association of being overweight with lymphedema (55.3%). Almost half of the participants recognized the physical therapy and rehabilitation department to be responsible for lymphedema treatment. The mean awareness score was 5.34 ± 1.56. Only 9.2% achieved a good awareness level, while 59.2% had fair awareness, and 31.6% had poor awareness. Conclusion The prevalence of lymphedema, coupled with proactive healthcare-seeking behavior, underscores the need for targeted educational interventions. While the majority recognized the importance of treatment, awareness gaps persisted, especially regarding risk-reduction activities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.