ArticleCureus2025
Is it Time to Ditch the DICH (Delayed Intracranial Hemorrhage) Yet?
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective Delayed intracranial hemorrhage (DICH) is a well-known injury that is rare among patients who are on antiplatelet and/or anticoagulants with head trauma. In this study, we aimed to test the hypothesis that DICH is unlikely to occur without a history of head impact and signs of head and/or face trauma. Materials and methods We conducted a two-year (2020-2021) retrospective study regarding the incidence of DICH at our institution. During the study period, our institution had created a protocol specifically for this patient population who possibly suffered head trauma while taking anticoagulants and/or antiplatelets. The primary outcome was the incidence of DICH. The secondary outcome was the association between DICH and signs of head and/or facial trauma. The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the institutional review board committee. Results During the study period, there were 259 patients who had suffered head impact while taking anticoagulants and/or antiplatelets. Of them, 225 patients (86.9%) had a negative initial head CT and were admitted for observation. Repeat CT head was performed in 217 patients (96.4%). Among the patients who received a second CT head, only one patient (0.46%) had DICH. The patient did well clinically and did not require any neurosurgical intervention. Conclusions Our findings suggest that DICH in patients taking anticoagulants/antiplatelets is unlikely, and a repeat head CT is unnecessary in the absence of changes in neurological status. Thus, it can be concluded that eliminating the routine repeat second CT scan can decrease the length of hospital stay and hospitalization costs. This study's findings highlight the need for more appropriate training related to patients with a history of head impact and signs of head trauma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.