Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40013161›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025

The relationship between weight-adjusted waist index and peripheral artery disease.

Zhe Wu, Yang Liu, Bin Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zhe WuThe First Clinical College, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.
Yang LiuDepartment of General Surgery, Vascular Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Bin WangDepartment of Vascular Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Obesity is a significant risk factor for peripheral arterial disease (PAD). The weight-adjusted waist index (WWI) is a novel obesity metric that better reflects abdominal obesity than traditional body mass index (BMI). However, research on the relationship between WWI and PAD remains scarce. Methods: Relevant data from the NHANES 1999-2004 were selected. Multiple logistic regression and restricted cubic spline (RCS) analyses were used to assess the relationship between WWI and the risk of PAD. Additionally, the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was used to evaluate the predictive ability of WWI for PAD. Results: A total of 5,686 participants were included in the study, of whom 476 had PAD and 5,210 did not. The results of multiple logistic regression showed that WWI was significantly positively associated with the risk of PAD after full adjustment for covariates (OR: 1.407, 95% CI: 1.100-1.799). Additionally, compared to the first quartile of WWI, the risk of PAD significantly increased in the second quartile (OR: 2.042, 95% CI: 1.333-3.129), third quartile (OR: 2.134, 95% CI: 1.354-3.364), and fourth quartile (OR: 2.491, 95% CI: 1.435-4.325). The ROC results showed that the AUC value for WWI was 0.697, while the AUC value for BMI was 0.520. Compared to BMI, WWI has a better predictive value for the risk of PAD. Conclusion: There is a significant positive correlation between WWI and the risk of PAD. For individuals with high WWI, efforts should be made to reduce WWI to prevent the onset of PAD.

Indexed as

cross-sectional studyNHANESobesityperipheral artery diseaseweight-adjusted waist index

Identifiers

PMID40013161
PMCPMC11860073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.