ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025
The relationship between weight-adjusted waist index and peripheral artery disease.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The metabolic score for visceral fat and risk of peripheral arterial disease in hypertension patients: a prospective cohort study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Association of weight-adjusted waist index with motoric cognitive risk syndrome in Chinese adults Aged ≥ 60 years.Lipids in health and disease · 2025Article
- Association of weight-adjusted waist index with all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality among rheumatoid arthritis population: a cohort study from the NHANES 1999-2018.Lipids in health and disease · 2025Article
- Association between age at first birth and cognitive function in women 60 years and older: the 2011-2014 cross-sectional National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) study.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Weight-Adjusted Waist Index as a Novel Predictor of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Evidence from NHANES 2013-2018.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Obesity is a significant risk factor for peripheral arterial disease (PAD). The weight-adjusted waist index (WWI) is a novel obesity metric that better reflects abdominal obesity than traditional body mass index (BMI). However, research on the relationship between WWI and PAD remains scarce. Methods: Relevant data from the NHANES 1999-2004 were selected. Multiple logistic regression and restricted cubic spline (RCS) analyses were used to assess the relationship between WWI and the risk of PAD. Additionally, the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was used to evaluate the predictive ability of WWI for PAD. Results: A total of 5,686 participants were included in the study, of whom 476 had PAD and 5,210 did not. The results of multiple logistic regression showed that WWI was significantly positively associated with the risk of PAD after full adjustment for covariates (OR: 1.407, 95% CI: 1.100-1.799). Additionally, compared to the first quartile of WWI, the risk of PAD significantly increased in the second quartile (OR: 2.042, 95% CI: 1.333-3.129), third quartile (OR: 2.134, 95% CI: 1.354-3.364), and fourth quartile (OR: 2.491, 95% CI: 1.435-4.325). The ROC results showed that the AUC value for WWI was 0.697, while the AUC value for BMI was 0.520. Compared to BMI, WWI has a better predictive value for the risk of PAD. Conclusion: There is a significant positive correlation between WWI and the risk of PAD. For individuals with high WWI, efforts should be made to reduce WWI to prevent the onset of PAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.