ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Advanced disease and CD8
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Infections are a major cause of early morbidity and mortality in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who are characterized by immunodeficiency secondary to disease. However, prospectively collected data on infection risk in this population are scarce. We aimed at identifying parameters in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) patients with predictive power for early severe infections (SI). Methods: We conducted a prospective study with newly diagnosed MGUS and NDMM patients. Besides clinical and laboratory data, immune parameters were collected at initial diagnosis before therapy initiation. Primary endpoint was the occurrence of SI within 12 months after diagnosis. Results: 45% of patients developed infection, 26% with SI. Four main risk factors for SI were identified: ECOG ≥ 2 (p < 0.001), ISS stage II/III (p = 0.002), therapeutic intervention (p < 0.001), and elevated CD8 Conclusion: We developed a straightforward risk score that considers the relevance of T cell fitness in MGUS and NDMM patients and can help physicians to identify patients at risk of infection, thus enabling the implementation of timely and individualized prevention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.