Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40013132›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical education2023

Polystyrene Laboratory Analysis: A Hands-On Experience for High School Students to Determine the Molecular Weight of Polystyrene Through Spin Casting.

Sahil Sood, Sean Fang, Alexander Chengyu Wang, Thomas Luong, Justin Keonhyoung Kim, Arkajyoti Sinha, John Jerome, Miriam H Rafailovich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sahil SoodGarcia Center for Polymers, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA, 11794.
Sean FangGarcia Center for Polymers, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA, 11794.
Alexander Chengyu WangGarcia Center for Polymers, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA, 11794.
Thomas LuongGarcia Center for Polymers, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA, 11794.
Justin Keonhyoung KimGarcia Center for Polymers, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA, 11794.
Arkajyoti SinhaGarcia Center for Polymers, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA, 11794.
John JeromeDepartment of Mathematics, Suffolk Community College, Selden, NY, USA, 11784.
Miriam H RafailovichDepartment of Materials Science and Chemical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA, 11794.

Funding

Physics and Biology - A Materials Science ApproachR13EB004243 · NIBIB · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI RAFAILOVICH, MIRIAM · 2004 to 2004
$10k
NIBIB NIH HHS R13 EB004243
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hands-on learning is a staple in high school science education, as it provides students with a fast-learning curve and a great degree of field competency. However, due to the safety risks associated with high school students in university chemistry laboratory settings, high school students rarely engage in authentic hands-on chemical learning. To bridge the gap between the benefits and drawbacks, this study investigates a method to educate high school students (with no previous experience) about standard chemical laboratory practices. 98 high school students experimented throughout two days to determine the molecular weights and characteristics of various polystyrene samples, essential knowledge for polymer recycling. Students were split into 5 groups so that laboratory usage be organized and staggered. After laboratory safety training was administered, students created different types and concentrations of toluene-based samples and spin casted these samples onto silicon wafers, determining thickness through ellipsometry. With the data, each group calculated molecular weight, propagated error, and wrote laboratory reports. In order to evaluate the extent of learning through this process, students were given pre-training and post-experimentation assessments with the same questions pertaining to laboratory safety, equipment usage, and materials science related topics. On average, students displayed scores 63% higher on the post-experiment assessment compared to those of the pre-training assessment. The results suggest the experience not only taught students about the various materials science concepts, but also improved their laboratory logic. Therefore, our method is recommended to be implemented at the university level for motivated high school and first-year undergraduate students.

Indexed as

First-year UndergraduatesHands-on LearningHigh School StudentsLaboratory EquipmentLaboratory InstructionMaterials Science and Chemistry

Identifiers

PMID40013132
PMCPMC11864792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.