Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40013100›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioinformatics2025

Seurat function argument values in scRNA-seq data analysis: potential pitfalls and refinements for biological interpretation.

Mikhail Arbatsky, Ekaterina Vasilyeva, Veronika Sysoeva, Ekaterina Semina, Valeri Saveliev, Kseniya Rubina

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mikhail ArbatskyFaculty of Medicine, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
Ekaterina VasilyevaInstitute of Higher Technologies, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Kaliningrad, Russia.
Veronika SysoevaFaculty of Medicine, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
Ekaterina SeminaFaculty of Medicine, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
Valeri SavelievInstitute of Higher Technologies, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Kaliningrad, Russia.
Kseniya RubinaFaculty of Medicine, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Processing biological data is a challenge of paramount importance as the amount of accumulated data has been annually increasing along with the emergence of new methods for studying biological objects. Blind application of mathematical methods in biology may lead to erroneous hypotheses and conclusions. Here we narrow our focus down to a small set of mathematical methods applied upon standard processing of scRNA-seq data: preprocessing, dimensionality reduction, integration, and clustering (using machine learning methods for clustering). Normalization and scaling are standard manipulations for the pre-processing with LogNormalize (natural-log transformation), CLR (centered log ratio transformation), and RC (relative counts) being employed as methods for data transformation. The justification for applying these methods in biology is not discussed in methodological articles. The essential aspect of dimensionality reduction is to identify the stable patterns which are deliberately removed upon mathematical data processing as being redundant, albeit containing important minor details for biological interpretation. There are no established rules for integration of datasets obtained at different sampling times or conditions. Clustering calls for reconsidering its application specifically for biological data processing. The novelty of the present study lies in an integrated approach of biology and bioinformatics to elucidate biological insights upon data processing.

Indexed as

biocentric mathematicscell clusteringdatasets integrationdimension reductionScRNA-seq

Identifiers

PMID40013100
PMCPMC11861183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.