Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40013094›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in aging neuroscience2025

Functional and effective EEG connectivity patterns in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review.

Elizabeth R Paitel, Christian B D Otteman, Mary C Polking, Henry J Licht, Kristy A Nielson

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elizabeth R PaitelAging, Imaging, and Memory Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, United States.
Christian B D OttemanAging, Imaging, and Memory Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, United States.
Mary C PolkingAging, Imaging, and Memory Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, United States.
Henry J LichtAging, Imaging, and Memory Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, United States.
Kristy A NielsonAging, Imaging, and Memory Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, United States.

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR001436 · NCATS · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI FREED, JULIE K · 2015 to 2025
$47.5M
J. NRSA Training CoreTL1TR001437 · NCATS · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI THOMAS, DANNY GEORGE · 2015 to 2024
$3.7M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR001437NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001436
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) might be best conceptualized as a disconnection syndrome, such that symptoms may be largely attributable to disrupted communication between brain regions, rather than to deterioration within discrete systems. EEG is uniquely capable of directly and non-invasively measuring neural activity with precise temporal resolution; connectivity quantifies the relationships between such signals in different brain regions. EEG research on connectivity in AD and mild cognitive impairment (MCI), often considered a prodromal phase of AD, has produced mixed results and has yet to be synthesized for comprehensive review. Thus, we performed a systematic review of EEG connectivity in MCI and AD participants compared with cognitively healthy older adult controls. Methods: We searched PsycINFO, PubMed, and Web of Science for peer-reviewed studies in English on EEG, connectivity, and MCI/AD relative to controls. Of 1,344 initial matches, 124 articles were ultimately included in the systematic review. Results: The included studies primarily analyzed coherence, phase-locked, and graph theory metrics. The influence of factors such as demographics, design, and approach was integrated and discussed. An overarching pattern emerged of lower connectivity in both MCI and AD compared to healthy controls, which was most prominent in the alpha band, and most consistent in AD. In the minority of studies reporting greater connectivity, theta band was most commonly implicated in both AD and MCI, followed by alpha. The overall prevalence of alpha effects may indicate its potential to provide insight into nuanced changes associated with AD-related networks, with the caveat that most studies were during the resting state where alpha is the dominant frequency. When greater connectivity was reported in MCI, it was primarily during task engagement, suggesting compensatory resources may be employed. In AD, greater connectivity was most common during rest, suggesting compensatory resources during task engagement may already be exhausted. Conclusion: The review highlighted EEG connectivity as a powerful tool to advance understanding of AD-related changes in brain communication. We address the need for including demographic and methodological details, using source space connectivity, and extending this work to cognitively healthy older adults with AD risk toward advancing early AD detection and intervention.

Indexed as

agingAlzheimer’s diseaseconnectivityEEGmild cognitive impairmentneurodegenerationneuroimaging

Identifiers

PMID40013094
PMCPMC11861106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.