Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40013087›Full record

ArticleOpen mind : discoveries in cognitive science2025

Approximating Human-Level 3D Visual Inferences With Deep Neural Networks.

Thomas P O'Connell, Tyler Bonnen, Yoni Friedman, Ayush Tewari, Vincent Sitzmann, Joshua B Tenenbaum, Nancy Kanwisher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Thomas P O'ConnellBrain & Cognitive Sciences, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Tyler BonnenEECS, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Yoni FriedmanBrain & Cognitive Sciences, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Ayush TewariCSAIL, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Vincent SitzmannCSAIL, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Joshua B TenenbaumBrain & Cognitive Sciences, CSAIL, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Nancy KanwisherBrain & Cognitive Sciences, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Funding

How Does the Functional Organization of the Human Brain Arise in Development?DP1HD091947 · NICHD · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI KANWISHER, NANCY · 2016 to 2020
$5.4M
Biologically Plausible Computational Models of Perirhinal CortexK00EY037496 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI BONNEN, TYLER · 2024 to 2025
$157k
Biologically Plausible Computational Models of Perirhinal CortexF99NS125816 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BONNEN, TYLER · 2022 to 2022
$41k
NEI NIH HHS K00 EY037496NICHD NIH HHS DP1 HD091947NINDS NIH HHS F99 NS125816
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans make rich inferences about the geometry of the visual world. While deep neural networks (DNNs) achieve human-level performance on some psychophysical tasks (e.g., rapid classification of object or scene categories), they often fail in tasks requiring inferences about the underlying shape of objects or scenes. Here, we ask whether and how this gap in 3D shape representation between DNNs and humans can be closed. First, we define the problem space: after generating a stimulus set to evaluate 3D shape inferences using a match-to-sample task, we confirm that standard DNNs are unable to reach human performance. Next, we construct a set of candidate 3D-aware DNNs including 3D neural field (Light Field Network), autoencoder, and convolutional architectures. We investigate the role of the learning objective and dataset by training single-view (the model only sees one viewpoint of an object per training trial) and multi-view (the model is trained to associate multiple viewpoints of each object per training trial) versions of each architecture. When the same object categories appear in the model training and match-to-sample test sets, multi-view DNNs approach human-level performance for 3D shape matching, highlighting the importance of a learning objective that enforces a common representation across viewpoints of the same object. Furthermore, the 3D Light Field Network was the model most similar to humans across all tests, suggesting that building in 3D inductive biases increases human-model alignment. Finally, we explore the generalization performance of multi-view DNNs to out-of-distribution object categories not seen during training. Overall, our work shows that multi-view learning objectives for DNNs are necessary but not sufficient to make similar 3D shape inferences as humans and reveals limitations in capturing human-like shape inferences that may be inherent to DNN modeling approaches. We provide a methodology for understanding human 3D shape perception within a deep learning framework and highlight out-of-domain generalization as the next challenge for learning human-like 3D representations with DNNs.

Indexed as

3D shape perceptiondeep neural networksneural fieldspsychophysics

Identifiers

PMID40013087
PMCPMC11864798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.