ReviewDigital health
Leveraging of digital triage to enhance access in obstetric emergencies in the maternity units: A scoping review of digital triage interventions in healthcare.
Review in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient safety practices in an innovative digital landscape: an interview study on triage in Swedish digital primary care.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2026Article
- Digital Health Interventions in Emergency Obstetric and Newborn Care Services in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Effectiveness and Implementation of Obstetric Triage During Pregnancy and Childbirth: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Midwives' Perspectives on the Adoption of a Digitalized Triage System in South African Maternity Units: Results from a Mixed-Methods Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pregnancy and childbirth are supposed to give a new beautiful meaning to life and it is a time of enormous delight and anticipation for both the women and their families. In these times, not only a baby is born, but a mother is born. However, inaccessibility and delays in obstetric care remain a common concern, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Digital health technologies are being implemented to improve healthcare access worldwide, but there is a lack of documented data on available digital triage interventions. This article sought to examine and critique existing digital triage interventions in the healthcare system with reference to obstetrics. Methods: Adopting a scoping review approach, using the five iterative steps proposed by Arksey and O'Malley, approximately 17 studies retrieved from databases like PubMed, Elsevier, EBSCohost, and google scholar were reviewed. Only the literature from 2014-2024 was included. Results: The review revealed that there are various types of digital triage interventions. However, they are flooded with weaknesses and threats among of which are diagnosis inaccuracy, insufficient information, and shortage of resources. Conclusions: The study recommends that strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats should not be overlooked, particularly when aiming to leverage digital health to improve access to emergency care in maternity units through digital triage. However, they should serve as a reference for the development of optimal digital triage systems for maternity and emergency units. Furthermore, the findings should also be a benchmark for digital triaging improvement strategies in the healthcare context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.