ReviewPulmonary circulation2025
How a Most Unlikely Drug Changed the Outcome of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.
Review in Pulmonary circulation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epoprostenol is a prostaglandin that was first identified by investigators in 1976 and found to be a potent vasodilator and inhibiter of platelet aggregation, initially in animal studies and subsequently in humans. Based on these properties epoprostenol, which has a short half-life of several minutes in vivo requiring continuous intravenous infusion, was administered to patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and found to decrease pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) during acute vasodilator testing. Investigators then studied the effects of long-term infusion of epoprostenol and observed sustained hemodynamic and clinical improvement, albeit with persistent elevation of pulmonary artery pressure and PVR. The results of a randomized multicenter study confirmed the benefit of epoprostenol, including improved survival, in patients with PAH leading to FDA approval in 1995. Before this, there was no effective therapy for the vast majority of patients with PAH. A number of other less complicated and safer medications have subsequently been approved for the treatment of patients with PAH. However, nearly 30 years after approval, despite the complexity and risks of continuous intravenous therapy, epoprostenol remains the most effective treatment for PAH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.