Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40013003›Full record

ReviewBiophysics reviews2025

Decoding the effects of mutation on protein interactions using machine learning.

Wang Xu, Anbang Li, Yunjie Zhao, Yunhui Peng

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysics reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wang XuInstitute of Biophysics and Department of Physics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China.
Anbang LiInstitute of Biophysics and Department of Physics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8063-1862
Yunjie ZhaoInstitute of Biophysics and Department of Physics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5256-9456
Yunhui PengInstitute of Biophysics and Department of Physics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9768-4127

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurately predicting mutation-caused binding free energy changes (ΔΔGs) on protein interactions is crucial for understanding how genetic variations affect interactions between proteins and other biomolecules, such as proteins, DNA/RNA, and ligands, which are vital for regulating numerous biological processes. Developing computational approaches with high accuracy and efficiency is critical for elucidating the mechanisms underlying various diseases, identifying potential biomarkers for early diagnosis, and developing targeted therapies. This review provides a comprehensive overview of recent advancements in predicting the impact of mutations on protein interactions across different interaction types, which are central to understanding biological processes and disease mechanisms, including cancer. We summarize recent progress in predictive approaches, including physicochemical-based, machine learning, and deep learning methods, evaluating the strengths and limitations of each. Additionally, we discuss the challenges related to the limitations of mutational data, including biases, data quality, and dataset size, and explore the difficulties in developing accurate prediction tools for mutation-induced effects on protein interactions. Finally, we discuss future directions for advancing these computational tools, highlighting the capabilities of advancing technologies, such as artificial intelligence to drive significant improvements in mutational effects prediction.

Identifiers

PMID40013003
PMCPMC11857871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.