ArticleBioinformatics and biology insights2025
Predicting TF-Target Gene Association Using a Heterogeneous Network and Enhanced Negative Sampling.
Article in Bioinformatics and biology insights, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Identifying interactions between transcription factors (TFs) and target genes is crucial for understanding the molecular mechanisms involved in biological processes and diseases. Traditional biological experiments used to determine these interactions are often time-consuming, costly, and limited in scale. Current computational methods mainly predict binding sites rather than direct interactions. Although recent studies have achieved high performance in predicting TF-target gene associations, they still face a significant challenge related to constructing a robust dataset of positive and negative samples. Currently, methods do not adequately focus on selecting negative samples, resulting in incomplete coverage of potential TF-target gene relationships. This article proposes a method to select enhanced negative samples to improve the prediction performance of TF-target gene interactions. Experimental results show that the proposed method achieves an average area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.9024 ± 0.0008 through 5-fold cross-validation. These results demonstrate the model's high efficiency and accuracy, confirming its potential application in predicting TF-target gene interactions across various datasets and paving the way for large-scale biomedical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.