ArticleIEEE robotics and automation letters2024
A Deep Learning Framework for End-to-End Control of Powered Prostheses.
Article in IEEE robotics and automation letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning-Based Estimation of Knee Joint Mechanics from Kinematic and Neuromuscular Inputs: A Proof-of-Concept Using the CAMS-Knee Datasets.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Task-Agnostic Approach to Unified Multi-Activity Gait Phase Estimation via Bilateral Sensing.IEEE ... International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics : [proceedings] · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep learning offers a potentially powerful alternative to hand-tuned control of active lower-limb prostheses, being capable of generating continuous joint-level assistance end-to-end. This eliminates the need for conventional task classification, state machines and mid-level control equations by collapsing the entire control problem into a deep neural network. In this letter, sensor data and conventional commanded torque from an open-source powered knee-ankle prosthesis (OSL) were collected across five locomotion modes: level ground, ramp incline/decline and stair ascent/descent. Reference commanded torques were generated using an expert-tuned finite state machine-based impedance controller for each mode and transfemoral amputee participant (N = 12). Stance phases of the output were then estimated using a temporal convolutional network (TCN), which produced mode- and user-independent knee and ankle torques with RMSE of 0.154 ± 0.06 and 0.106 ± 0.06 Nm/kg, respectively. Training the model on mode-specific data only produced significant reductions in stair descent, lowering knee and ankle RMSE by 0.06 ± 0.028 and 0.033 ± 0.008 Nm/kg respectively (p < 0.05). In addition, the TCN adapted to walking speed and slope shifts in reference commanded torque. These results demonstrate that this deep learning model not only removes the need for heuristic state machines and mode classification but can also reduce or remove the need for prosthesis assistance tuning entirely.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.