ArticlePalliative medicine reports2024
Development of a Complex Intervention to Support the Use of Sedative Drugs in Specialist Palliative Care (iSedPall).
Article in Palliative medicine reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical decision support for potentially sedating drugs in palliative care: a mixed-methods pilot study.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- A complex intervention to support the use of sedative drugs in specialist palliative care: results from the iSedPall pilot study.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- The decision-making process for sedation in specialist palliative care: a qualitative interview study with team members, relatives, and patients.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- "Is this sedation?" - a Group Delphi process to define cut-off doses and dosing intervals for potentially sedating drugs in palliative care.BMC palliative care · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The option of intentional sedation to relieve intolerable suffering from treatment-refractory symptoms may elicit a feeling of safety for patients and informal caregivers as a last resort if the situation becomes unbearable. Many health care professionals feel uncomfortable and insecure in conducting intentional sedation due to specific challenges. We developed a complex intervention to support best practice use of sedative drugs in specialist palliative care in Germany based on previously published recommendations. This article aims at reporting the development of the intervention. Methods: The development of the intervention was based on theory and existing evidence with active stakeholder participation and patient and public involvement, following the updated Medical Research Council (MRC) Framework on complex interventions. A "Theory of Change," drawing on expert-approved best practice recommendations and applying user-centered methods, fostered the development. The process encompassed study preparation, development of the elements of the intervention, and designing the multimodal intervention. For reporting, we adhere to the Guidance for Reporting Intervention Development framework. Results: The intervention is aimed at health care professionals working in specialist palliative care (inpatient and homecare settings) and consists of several components: (1) a screening tool, (2) the individual elements of the intervention, and (3) educational material for health care professionals to support them using the intervention. Additional information material was developed for patients and informal caregivers. Despite the benefits of stakeholder involvement, we faced some barriers due to limited health care staff and time resources and reservations regarding research in general. Discussion: A pilot study is planned for testing the overall feasibility of the intervention and exploring possible benefits for health care professionals to inform a subsequent fully powered implementation study. To deal with the challenges, we stayed in contact with the health care teams, maintained transparency, and provided opportunities for active participation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.