Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40012850›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2025

Axonal regeneration and innervation ratio following supercharged end-to-side nerve transfer.

Leopold Harnoncourt, Martin Schmoll, Christopher Festin, Laurenz Pflaum, Markus Breuss, Johanna Klepetko, Dominik C Dotzauer, Florian J Jaklin, Udo Maierhofer, Philipp Tratnig-Frankl and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Targeted muscle reinnervation for treatment of painful stump neuroma].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Leopold HarnoncourtClinical Laboratory for Bionic Extremity Reconstruction, Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Martin SchmollCenter for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Christopher FestinClinical Laboratory for Bionic Extremity Reconstruction, Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Laurenz PflaumClinical Laboratory for Bionic Extremity Reconstruction, Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Markus BreussCenter for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Johanna KlepetkoClinical Laboratory for Bionic Extremity Reconstruction, Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Dominik C DotzauerClinical Laboratory for Bionic Extremity Reconstruction, Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Florian J JaklinClinical Laboratory for Bionic Extremity Reconstruction, Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Udo MaierhoferClinical Laboratory for Bionic Extremity Reconstruction, Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Philipp Tratnig-FranklClinical Laboratory for Bionic Extremity Reconstruction, Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Oskar C AszmannClinical Laboratory for Bionic Extremity Reconstruction, Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Peripheral nerve injuries often result in incomplete recovery, particularly after the occurrence of proximal lesions, owing to the extended reinnervation time as well as consequent reductions in the regeneration supportive factors and muscle recovery potential. In these cases, supercharged end-to-side (SETS) nerve transfers preserve the continuity of the original nerves while facilitating additional axonal support to mitigate muscle atrophy. This approach enhances functional recovery and has been demonstrated to be effective in both preclinical models and clinical settings. In this study, a novel SETS nerve transfer model is presented for the upper extremity of the rat to assess the impacts on muscle function, innervation ratio, and motor neuron regeneration as well as investigate the potential to enhance motor function recovery. Methods: The surgical interventions include transection and end-to-end repair of the musculocutaneous nerve (MCN) in Group A, transfer of the ulnar nerve (UN) to the side of the MCN in Group B, and a combination of both in Group C. The biceps muscle function was assessed 12 weeks post-surgery using electrical stimulation. Results: Muscle assessments revealed no significant differences in force between the experimental groups. UN-related muscle reinnervation was observed only in Group C after transfer to a regenerating nerve. Retrograde labeling demonstrated motor neuron regeneration of both the MCN and UN in a distal direction toward the muscle; however, tracer uptake of the UN motor neurons following intramuscular tracer application was detected only in Group C. In contrast, stained pseudounipolar cells in the dorsal root ganglia associated with the UN and MCN revealed afferent muscle innervations in Groups B and C. Discussion: This novel SETS nerve transfer model enables isolated electrophysiological as well as histological evaluations of all nerve sections to determine the muscle innervation ratio exactly. Our findings indicate that substantial functional efferent muscle innervation by the donor nerve is exclusively observed in a regenerating environment.

Indexed as

innervation rationerve transferperipheral nerve regenerationreversed end-to-sidesupercharged end-to-side

Identifiers

PMID40012850
PMCPMC11860980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.