ReviewJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2025
The use of three-dimensional printing and virtual reality technologies in orthopaedics-with a focus on orthopaedic trauma.
Review in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enhancing orthopedic education in China with the BOPPPS teaching model and 3D printing technology: a comparative study.3D printing in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although the use of three-dimensional printing in orthopaedics is relatively new, many benefits of this technology to both patients and providers have already been observed. Printing models of fractured bone based upon segmented CT imaging allows for improved surgical planning as surgeons are able to view and physically manipulate accurate representations of fracture patterns prior to surgery, increasing both speed and accuracy of fixation in the operating room. The use of three-dimensional models by surgeons prior to surgery has been shown to reduce blood loss, intraoperative time, and fluoroscopy use. These models also have incredible potential in orthopaedic resident and patient education. Among residents, these models significantly improve recognition of fracture patterns, while patients benefit from the use of these models through increased trust and satisfaction with their surgeon's care, as well as decreased anxiety about their injury. Currently, the imaging segmentation and model generation process are prohibitively costly both in terms of time and money; however, in the future, three-dimensional printing may become a point-of-care technology in the orthopaedic field as technology improves and costs decrease. This article aims to illustrate the value of three-dimensional printing and virtual reality technologies in preoperative planning and intraoperative precision, resident education, and patient understanding and satisfaction. The benefits and challenges of the technologies are discussed, as well as current limitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.