ArticleEnvironmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.)2025
Associations between ambient pollen exposure and measures of cognitive performance.
Article in Environmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Prior research suggests pollen allergies may be associated with cognitive function, although the effect sizes and specific cognitive outcomes varied across studies. With pollen seasons starting earlier and intensifying due to climate change, understanding the effects of pollen exposure on cognition is increasingly relevant. This study investigated the relationship between ambient pollen exposure and cognitive performance in Swiss adults. Methods: Four cognitive assessments were used to measure the daily performance of 392 participants (299 with pollen allergies) over a 10-day period during pollen season. We used generalized additive mixed models to assess the exposure-response relationship between individualized pollen exposure and cognitive performance, as well as allergic symptom severity and cognitive performance, adjusting for individual characteristics and time-varying environmental and individual confounders (e.g., air pollution, weather, and coffee intake). Results: We did not find any statistically significant relationships between pollen exposure or severity of allergic symptoms and overall score or reaction time on tests of response inhibition, attention, and visual-spatial memory. We observed a 1% increase [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.13%, 2.0%] in average reaction time on a test of grammatical reasoning for allergic participants at an exposure of 300 pollen/m Conclusion: Overall, our study population did not exhibit changes in cognitive performance related to pollen exposure or perceived allergic symptoms. A marginal, but statistically significant effect on the response time of pollen-allergic individuals was observed for a test of verbal reasoning, however, this is likely to be a chance finding considering the number of exposures and outcomes evaluated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.