ArticleWorld journal of clinical cases2025
Summary of the current guidelines for managing iatrogenic colorectal perforations and the evolving role of endoluminal vacuum therapy.
Article in World journal of clinical cases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Endoscopic versus surgical management for iatrogenic colonic perforations: a GRADE-assessed systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Pooled it
- First Successful Regeneration of a Structurally Native-Like Colon Using a Bioabsorbable Polymer Sheet.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2026Article
- Scarred and complex colorectal polyps: Traditional techniques and emerging alternatives.World journal of methodology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colonoscopy represents a safe procedure that is widely used in medical practice either to diagnose or treat various gastrointestinal diseases. During the last few years, the incidence rate of perforations in colonoscopic procedures has increased, especially in therapeutic colonoscopies. The recent advancements in endoscopic techniques and gastrointestinal tumoral resection procedures such as endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic full-thickness resection, and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) could be a risk factor for this increased risk. The incidence rate of mortality of serious colonoscopic perforations is 7.1%. The management plan for these perforations starts with conservative treatment in mild cases, endoscopic closure, and surgical management in severe cases. Recently, endoluminal vacuum therapy was found to be effective in the management of colorectal perforations and this has been reported in multiple case reports. This editorial provides an overview of the current guidelines for the management of iatrogenic colorectal perforations. These insights are from the perspectives of endoscopists and gastroenterologists. We also present a management algorithm based on the guidelines of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, the American Gastroenterological Association, and the World Society of Emergency Surgery. We also discussed in brief the use of endoluminal vacuum therapy in colorectal perforations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.