Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40012810›Full record

ArticlePsychology research and behavior management2025

Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Chinese Version of the Perceived Stress Reactivity Scale.

Xinlei Qu, Yu Luo, Yuanyi Liu, Xiangcai He, Yu Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychology research and behavior management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xinlei QuSchool of Psychology, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, Guizhou, 550025, People's Republic of China.
Yu LuoSchool of Psychology, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, Guizhou, 550025, People's Republic of China.
Yuanyi LiuSchool of Psychology, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, Guizhou, 550025, People's Republic of China.
Xiangcai HeSchool of Psychology, Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610500, People's Republic of China.
Yu ZhangSchool of Psychology, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, Guizhou, 550025, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Perceived Stress Reactivity Scale (PSRS) in the Chinese population. Methods: A total of 3560 Chinese participants aged 18-60 years from various provinces and cities in mainland China were included. Sample 1 (n = 3316) was used for CFA, MI, internal consistency, convergent, criterion-related validity, and difference analysis. Sample 2 (n = 244) was employed to evaluate test-retest reliability over a four-week interval. Results: The study validated a robust 23-item, five-factor structure for the Chinese PSRS, demonstrating strong reliability with a Cronbach's α of 0.90 and a test-retest reliability of 0.83. The PSRS and its subscales were significantly correlated with measures of depression, stress, anxiety, and self-efficacy. Strict invariance was observed across gender and age groups (18-40 and 41-60 years). Women and young adults scored higher on the overall scale and most subscales compared with their counterparts. Conclusion: The PSRS is a reliable instrument for assessing perceived stress reactivity within the Chinese population. By validating its cultural adaptation and psychometric properties, this study lays a foundation for its cross-cultural application. The findings contribute to a deeper understanding of perceived stress reactivity differences across gender and age groups and provide practical insights for future interventions and stress management research in the Chinese population.

Indexed as

agegenderindividual differencesmeasurement invarianceperceived stress reactivitypsychometrics

Identifiers

PMID40012810
PMCPMC11863784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.