ArticlePsychology research and behavior management2025
Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Chinese Version of the Perceived Stress Reactivity Scale.
Article in Psychology research and behavior management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Perceived Stress Reactivity Scale (PSRS) in the Chinese population. Methods: A total of 3560 Chinese participants aged 18-60 years from various provinces and cities in mainland China were included. Sample 1 (n = 3316) was used for CFA, MI, internal consistency, convergent, criterion-related validity, and difference analysis. Sample 2 (n = 244) was employed to evaluate test-retest reliability over a four-week interval. Results: The study validated a robust 23-item, five-factor structure for the Chinese PSRS, demonstrating strong reliability with a Cronbach's α of 0.90 and a test-retest reliability of 0.83. The PSRS and its subscales were significantly correlated with measures of depression, stress, anxiety, and self-efficacy. Strict invariance was observed across gender and age groups (18-40 and 41-60 years). Women and young adults scored higher on the overall scale and most subscales compared with their counterparts. Conclusion: The PSRS is a reliable instrument for assessing perceived stress reactivity within the Chinese population. By validating its cultural adaptation and psychometric properties, this study lays a foundation for its cross-cultural application. The findings contribute to a deeper understanding of perceived stress reactivity differences across gender and age groups and provide practical insights for future interventions and stress management research in the Chinese population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.