ArticleJournal of current ophthalmology
Unveiling a
Article in Journal of current ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Revealing a HeterozygousJournal of current ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To identify the potential genetic factors responsible for retinal capillary hemangioblastoma (RCH) and Type II granular corneal dystrophy (GCDII), with autosomal dominant inheritance. We used whole-exome sequencing (WES) in an Iranian family to identify the possible genetic etiology of RCH and GCDII with other manifestations of von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease. Methods: This study included one Iranian family for WES in index patients and Sanger sequencing in all available individuals. Results: Clinical presentations of these patients included RCH, GCD, central nervous system hemangioblastoma as well as pancreatic cyst. WES disclosed a heterozygous known pathogenic variant c.371G>A (p.R124H) in exon 4 of gene Conclusions: For the first time, our research identified the potential involvement of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.