ArticleJournal of current ophthalmology
Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Damages from Macular Grasping during Vitrectomy Comparing Traditional and Three-Dimensional Microscope: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Article in Journal of current ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To analyze the advantages of the new advanced three-dimensional (3D) heads-up microscopy system in vitreoretinal surgery compared to a standard optical microscope, by evaluating postoperative tissue trauma, defined by the extent of swelling of the arcuate nerve fiber layer (SANFL). Methods: Sixty-four consecutive eyes affected by macular pucker or macular hole underwent macular peeling using a traditional optical microscope (Leica F40) or a 3D heads-up microscopy system (NGENUITY 3D Visualization System). Infrared, blue autofluorescence imaging, and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) were performed preoperatively and 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months after surgery. The presence of SANFLs was checked postoperatively on infrared and blue autofluorescence fundus imaging, and the extent of each SANFL was measured on OCT near-infrared fundus images. Results: The presence and the extension of SANFLs were comparable in the two groups ( Conclusion: NGENUITY system is comparable in terms of visual and anatomical results, offering perspectives for the integration of new advanced visualization technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.