ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2025
Characterization and genomic analysis of a
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biocontrol of Staphylococcus aureus in dairy products using lytic bacteriophage UHP46: efficacy in milk, cheese, and yogurt.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026Article
- Antibiofilm efficacy and genomic characterization of a lytic bacteriophage targeting MDR uropathogenic Escherichia coli.Archives of microbiology · 2026Article
- A comprehensive analysis of the kinetics of infection of lytic bacteriophages specific to the ESKAPE and critical pathogens.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Review
- Bovine serum albumin nanoparticles improve bacteriophage stability and antimicrobial activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Bovine mastitis and antimicrobial resistance in Pakistan's dairy sector: current status and future prospects.Veterinary research communications · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mastitis is a widespread disease on a global scale, significantly impacting the dairy industry. Mastitis in dairy cattle is caused by over 150 different bacteria, with Methods: Results: Phage UHP46, belonging to the Conclusion: These findings suggest that phage UHP46 could serve as a promising alternative to antibiotics for managing
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.