Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40012756›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2025

The role of art knowledge training on aesthetic judgements and executive functions.

Ionela Bara, Emily S Cross, Richard Ramsey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ionela BaraWales Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience, School of Human and Behavioural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8442-5089
Emily S CrossSocial Brain Sciences Lab, Department of Humanities, Social and Political Sciences, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Richard RamseyWales Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience, School of Human and Behavioural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0329-2112

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of how we develop art knowledge can provide valuable insights into the underlying cognitive systems that support expertise and knowledge transfer to new contexts. An important and largely unanswered question is whether art knowledge training impacts subsequent judgements of artworks and executive functions. Across three pre-registered experiments (

Indexed as

aesthetic judgementsart knowledgedose–responseexecutive functionsgeneralization effectstraining

Identifiers

PMID40012756
PMCPMC11858790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.