Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40012708›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in medical oncology2025

Adopting tomorrow's therapies today: a perspective review of adoptive cell therapy in lung cancer.

Faith Abodunrin, Daniel J Olson, Oluwatosin Emehinola, Christine M Bestvina

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Therapeutic Vaccination in Lung Cancer: Past Attempts, Current Approaches and Future Promises.Journal of respiratory biology and translational medicine · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Faith AbodunrinSection of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6509-1658
Daniel J OlsonSection of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Oluwatosin EmehinolaDepartment of Internal Medicine, New York Medical College at Saint Michael's Medical Center, Newark, NJ, USA.
Christine M BestvinaSection of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, MC 2115, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung cancer is the leading cause of all cancer-related deaths in the United States and remains a global health challenge. While targeted therapy has revolutionized the treatment landscape of nonsmall cell lung cancer, many patients lack actionable mutations. Immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), have significantly impacted outcomes in lung cancer in the last decade. Some patients, however, never respond or become refractory to ICIs. Newer therapies aimed at augmenting the immune system and enhancing antitumor effects are currently being explored. Adoptive cell therapy (ACT) employs T cells isolated from either tumors or peripheral blood and often engineers them to effect antitumor immune response. Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy, engineered T cell receptor therapy, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes are examples of adoptive cellular therapies. CAR-T cell therapy has been successful in the treatment of hematological malignancies with several CAR products gaining approval in the treatment of refractory blood cancers. The success of ACTs in hematological cancers has fueled research into the role of these therapies in solid cancers including lung cancer. Many trials have had early promising results, with many clinical trials currently enrolling. There are many limitations to the efficacy of ACTs, as well as risks and benefits with the individual subtypes of ACT. With growing knowledge about tumor antigens and more advanced cell engineering, there is potential for ACT to result in durable responses in immunologically "cold" tumors. Here, we review the major subtypes of ACTs, evidence supporting their use in lung cancer, challenges, and future perspectives in ACTs. Additionally, we include T cell engagers and mRNA vaccine studies and potential combinatorial strategies in lung cancer.

Indexed as

adoptive cell therapycancer vaccinesCAR-T cell therapyimmunotherapylung cancertumor-infiltrating lymphocytes

Identifiers

PMID40012708
PMCPMC11863254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.