ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2025
Development of a Framework for the Enrollment of Children and Families in Emergency Department Research.
Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: There remains a need to establish best practices for ethical and inclusive enrollment of children in emergency settings outside of established research networks. We aimed to develop a stakeholder-informed framework for enrolling children and families in emergency department (ED) research. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional mixed-methods study using a convergent parallel design. Data collection tools were formulated by a multidisciplinary team. We approached caregivers of pediatric ED patients at a single site to complete a tablet-based questionnaire. We conducted 4-item structured interviews with (1) clinicians in a single pediatric ED and (2) pediatric ED researchers from across the United States. We calculated descriptive statistics for quantitative data and conducted a content analysis of qualitative data. These data were merged to develop a framework to support research recruitment and enrollment in the pediatric ED. Results: The questionnaire was completed by 225 caregivers (61% response). Caregivers' likelihood of participating in research was high but varied by type of research, perceived importance, and the clinical context. Researchers (n = 11) and clinicians (n = 8) identified barriers to and facilitators of research recruitment in the ED at the caregiver, clinician, and systems level. Merging these data, we developed a framework of 5 principles: (1) high-quality communication is essential; (2) discussions about research participation cannot be coercive; (3) partnership with clinical teams is necessary; (4) research teams must adapt to unpredictability; and (5) participation in research may be viewed as an opportunity by families. Conclusion: Our framework provides key considerations for conducting ED research with children and families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.