ArticleFrontiers in digital health2024
Leveraging machine learning and rule extraction for enhanced transparency in emergency department length of stay prediction.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Emergency Department Overcrowding: A Systematic Review with Large Language Model-Assisted Screening.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Machine learning-enhanced prediction of operating room occupation time and length of stay: a retrospective cohort study on emergency surgery care pathways.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to address the critical issue of emergency department (ED) overcrowding, which negatively affects patient outcomes, wait times, and resource efficiency. Accurate prediction of ED length of stay (LOS) can streamline operations and improve care delivery. We utilized the MIMIC IV-ED dataset, comprising over 400,000 patient records, to classify ED LOS into short (≤4.5 hours) and long (>4.5 hours) categories. Using machine learning models, including Gradient Boosting (GB), Random Forest (RF), Logistic Regression (LR), and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), we identified GB as the best performing model outperforming the other models with an AUC of 0.730, accuracy of 69.93%, sensitivity of 88.20%, and specificity of 40.95% on the original dataset. In the balanced dataset, GB had an AUC of 0.729, accuracy of 68.86%, sensitivity of 75.39%, and specificity of 58.59%. To enhance interpretability, a novel rule extraction method for GB model was implemented using relevant important predictors, such as triage acuity, comorbidity scores, and arrival methods. By combining predictive analytics with interpretable rule-based methods, this research provides actionable insights for optimizing patient flow and resource allocation. The findings highlight the importance of transparency in machine learning applications for healthcare, paving the way for future improvements in model performance and clinical adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.