Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40012594›Full record

ArticleBrain circulation

Neurovascular management of intracranial internal carotid artery dissection post-carotid endarterectomy: A case report of an innovative approach.

Bibhas Amatya, Ameet V Chitale, Dipankar Mukherjee

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Brain circulation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bibhas AmatyaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Ameet V ChitaleDepartment of Neurosurgery, Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, VA, USA.
Dipankar MukherjeeDepartment of Surgery, Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, VA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is an established method of stroke prevention in patients with severe carotid artery stenosis, especially in those with symptomatic disease. Complications of CEA include perioperative stroke, cranial nerve palsy, hemorrhage, and vascular dissection. We present an unusual case of a 66-year-old man who presented for elective right CEA for symptomatic 70% right internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis due to ulcerated plaque. Following surgery, the patient developed fluctuating neurological deficits consistent with involvement of the right middle cerebral artery territory. Imaging revealed possible mild clamp-induced ICA dissection limited to the ICA in the neck. Despite initial successful anticoagulation management in the neurointensive care unit, the patient returned 2 days later with stroke symptoms, necessitating urgent endovascular intervention. Neurovascular interventions involved aspiration thrombectomy and multiple stenting extending distally into intracranial ICA, which successfully restored cerebral arterial perfusion and normal neurological function. This case highlights the first reported instance of extensive intracranial ICA dissection managed with full-length stenting. This article offers an effective endovascular procedure for preventing a devastating stroke from a complication of a procedure that was performed to prevent it.

Indexed as

Carotid endarterectomyinternal carotid artery dissectioninternal carotid artery stenosispenumbra

Identifiers

PMID40012594
PMCPMC11850933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.