Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40012559›Full record

ArticlePain reports2025

Difficulties with prescribed opioids: a cross-sectional survey of primary care patients in England, United Kingdom.

Louise E Wilson, Roger D Knaggs, Anthony J Avery, Tracey Thornley, José Moss, Reham M Baamer, Matthew J Boyd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Louise E WilsonDivision of Pharmacy Practice and Policy, School of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4200-1074
Roger D KnaggsDivision of Pharmacy Practice and Policy, School of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1646-8321
Anthony J AveryCentre for Academic Primary Care, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7591-4438
Tracey ThornleyDivision of Pharmacy Practice and Policy, School of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9276-052X
José MossBoots UK, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Reham M BaamerDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3775-5346
Matthew J BoydDivision of Pharmacy Practice and Policy, School of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2997-5090

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Knowledge of the potential for harm and adverse effects from long-term opioid medicines has led to reduced prescribing in recent years. However, the number of patients receiving opioid prescriptions from primary care in England remains substantial and understanding the difficulties patients experience with these medicines is important for the provision of care. Objective: To understand the difficulties experienced by patients prescribed opioids for noncancer pain in primary care. Methods: A cross-sectional postal survey of adults prescribed an opioid medicine for noncancer pain over a period of ≥3 months from 10 general practices (n = 3077) in the East Midlands was conducted using self-completed questionnaires. Sociodemographic, pain, and opioid use information was gathered to characterise the study population. An adapted version of the 15-item Prescribed Opioids Difficulties Scale was used to assess the problems and concerns attributed to using prescribed opioids, from the time opioids were first prescribed. Results: Questionnaires were received from 619 respondents (response rate = 20.1%), of whom 59.8% were female, and the median age was 64 years. Four in 5 (79.8%) had experienced at least one opioid problem or concern from the Prescribed Opioids Difficulties Scale, and one in 5 (22.8%) had experienced 8 or more. The most frequently reported difficulty was needing to increase the dose of opioids to get the same effect (46.0%). Chi-square analysis with odds ratio found respondents were 2.6 times more likely to report ≥4 difficulties if they had higher pain intensity and interference (95% CI: 1.85-3.77, Conclusion: Opioid difficulties were common in this population and this study provides evidence for regular monitoring of problems after prescribing.

Indexed as

Cross-sectional surveyOpioidsPainPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID40012559
PMCPMC11864306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.