Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40012545›Full record

ArticleDiscover psychology2025

Investigating the negative link between perfectionism and emotional divergent thinking.

Jean-Christophe Goulet-Pelletier, Marie-France Beaudin, Denis Cousineau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Discover psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Do You See the Difference Between Perfection and Excellence?Psychology research and behavior management · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jean-Christophe Goulet-PelletierUniversity of Montreal, Montreal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2016-549X
Marie-France BeaudinUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Canada.ORCID 0009-0000-0178-8918
Denis CousineauUniversity of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5908-0402

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous research has shown that perfectionism was negatively associated with the generation of original ideas in Divergent Thinking (DT) tasks, while striving for excellence was positively associated with it. However, the explanatory variables for these effects remain unclear. This study investigated the mediating roles of doubts about actions, concerns over mistakes, openness to experience, empathy, and emotions during DT tasks. Additionally, it examined an emotional DT task (i.e., naming frustrating things and things that affect one's self-esteem). From a sample of n = 282 university students, we replicated the negative association between perfectionism and DT abilities, though the effect size was smaller than in prior studies. Perfectionism correlated with lower empathy and greater primary negative emotions (e.g., fear) but similar openness to experience compared to excellencism. Mediation analyses revealed that doubts and concerns were unrelated to DT abilities. Openness to experience and empathy were positively correlated with DT abilities. Primary negative emotions during the tasks were negatively associated with the originality of answers. In contrast, positive emotions and secondary negative emotions (e.g., embarrassment) predicted more original ideas. These findings emphasize the importance of promoting excellencism over perfectionism to foster original ideas. This study has implications for overcoming barriers and supporting the creative process of individuals high on perfectionism. It also has implications for creativity researchers investigating the role of empathy and emotions in DT abilities. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44202-025-00330-x.

Indexed as

Divergent thinkingEmotionExcellencismOpenness to experiencePerfectionism

Identifiers

PMID40012545
PMCPMC11850400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.